Clusters of Humans in Syllogistic Reasoning under the Weak Completion Semantics

From International Center for Computational Logic
Revision as of 15:54, 7 August 2017 by Emma Dietz (talk | contribs) (Page created automatically by parser function on page Thema3504)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Toggle side column

Clusters of Humans in Syllogistic Reasoning under the Weak Completion Semantics

project thesis by Richard Mörbitz
It seems widely accepted that human reasoning cannot be modeled by means of classical logic. Psychological experiments have repeatedly shown that participants' answers systematically deviate from the classical logically correct answers. Recently, a new computational logic approach to modeling human syllogistic reasoning has been developed which seems to perform better than other state-of-the-art cognitive theories. We take this approach as starting point, yet instead of trying to model the human reasoner, we aim at identifying clusters of reasoners, which can be characterized by principles or by heuristic strategies.