"Most of" leads to undecidability: Failure of adding frequencies to LTL

From International Center for Computational Logic

"Most of" leads to undecidability: Failure of adding frequencies to LTL

Talk by Bartosz Bednarczyk
(joint work with Jakub Michaliszyn from University of Wrocław)

Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) interpreted on finite traces is a robust specification framework popular in formal verification. However, despite the high interest in the logic in recent years, the topic of their quantitative extensions is not yet fully explored. The main goal of this work is to study the effect of adding weak forms of percentage constraints (e.g. that most of the positions in the past satisfy a given condition, or that sigma is the most-frequent letter occurring in the past) to fragments of LTL. Such extensions could potentially be used for the verification of influence networks or statistical reasoning. Unfortunately, as we prove in the paper, it turns out that percentage extensions of even tiny fragments of LTL have undecidable satisfiability and model-checking problems. Our undecidability proofs not only sharpen most of the undecidability results on logics with arithmetics interpreted on words known from the literature, but also are fairly simple. We also show that the undecidability can be avoided by restricting the allowed usage of the negation, and briefly discuss how the undecidability results transfer to first-order logic on words.

The talk will take approximately 30 minutes and will be held online via BigBlueButton. To access the room, take one of the following links:

with ZIH-login:


without ZIH-login: