LATPub642: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
Marcel Lippmann (Diskussion | Beiträge)
KKeine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
Marcel Lippmann (Diskussion | Beiträge)
KKeine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
(2 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
{{Publikation Erster Autor
{{Publikation Erster Autor
|ErsterAutorVorname=C.
|ErsterAutorVorname=Carsten
|ErsterAutorNachname=Lutz
|ErsterAutorNachname=Lutz
|FurtherAuthors=
|FurtherAuthors=
Zeile 15: Zeile 15:
}}
}}
{{Publikation Details
{{Publikation Details
|Abstract= Until now, interval-based temporal Description Logics (DLs) did---if at
|Abstract= Until now, interval-based temporal Description Logics (DLs) did---if at all---only admit TBoxes of a very restricted form, namely acyclic macro definitions. In this paper, we present a temporal DL that overcomes this deficieny and combines interval-based temporal reasoning with general TBoxes. We argue that this combination is very interesting for many application domains. An automata-based decision procedure is devised and a tight ExpTime-complexity bound is obtained. Since the presented logic can be viewed as being equipped with a concrete domain, our results can be seen from a different perspective: We show that there exist interesting concrete domains for which reasoning with general TBoxes in decidable.
  all---only admit TBoxes of a very restricted form, namely acyclic macro
  definitions. In this paper, we present a temporal DL that overcomes this
  deficieny and combines interval-based temporal reasoning with general
  TBoxes. We argue that this combination is very interesting for many
  application domains. An automata-based decision procedure is devised and a
  tight ExpTime-complexity bound is obtained. Since the presented logic can
  be viewed as being equipped with a concrete domain, our results can be
  seen from a different perspective: We show that there exist interesting
  concrete domains for which reasoning with general TBoxes in decidable.
 
 
|ISBN=
|ISBN=
|ISSN=
|ISSN=
Zeile 45: Zeile 34:
   year = {2000},
   year = {2000},
}
}
}}
}}

Aktuelle Version vom 25. März 2015, 16:34 Uhr

Toggle side column

Interval-based Temporal Reasoning with General TBoxes

Carsten LutzCarsten Lutz
Carsten Lutz
Interval-based Temporal Reasoning with General TBoxes
Technical Report, LuFG Theoretical Computer Science, RWTH Aachen, volume LTCS-00-06, 2000. LTCS-Report
  • KurzfassungAbstract
    Until now, interval-based temporal Description Logics (DLs) did---if at all---only admit TBoxes of a very restricted form, namely acyclic macro definitions. In this paper, we present a temporal DL that overcomes this deficieny and combines interval-based temporal reasoning with general TBoxes. We argue that this combination is very interesting for many application domains. An automata-based decision procedure is devised and a tight ExpTime-complexity bound is obtained. Since the presented logic can be viewed as being equipped with a concrete domain, our results can be seen from a different perspective: We show that there exist interesting concrete domains for which reasoning with general TBoxes in decidable.
  • Bemerkung: Note: See http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/Reports.html.
  • Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: AutomatentheorieAutomata Theory
@techreport{ Lutz-LTCS-00-06,
  address = {Germany},
  author = {C. {Lutz}},
  institution = {LuFG Theoretical Computer Science, RWTH Aachen},
  note = {See http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/Reports.html.},
  number = {LTCS-00-06},
  title = {Interval-based Temporal Reasoning with General TBoxes},
  type = {LTCS-Report},
  year = {2000},
}