Thema3504: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Emma Dietz (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Tomas Masopust (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
|Forschungsgruppe=Wissensverarbeitung | |Forschungsgruppe=Wissensverarbeitung | ||
|Abschlussarbeitsstatus=Abgeschlossen | |Abschlussarbeitsstatus=Abgeschlossen | ||
|Beginn=2017 | |||
|Beschreibung EN=It seems widely accepted that human reasoning cannot be modeled by means of classical logic. Psychological experiments have repeatedly shown that participants' answers systematically deviate from the classical logically correct answers. Recently, a new computational logic approach to modeling human syllogistic reasoning has been developed which seems to perform better than other state-of-the-art cognitive theories. We take this approach as starting point, yet instead of trying to model the human reasoner, we aim at identifying clusters of reasoners, which can be characterized by principles or by heuristic strategies. | |Beschreibung EN=It seems widely accepted that human reasoning cannot be modeled by means of classical logic. Psychological experiments have repeatedly shown that participants' answers systematically deviate from the classical logically correct answers. Recently, a new computational logic approach to modeling human syllogistic reasoning has been developed which seems to perform better than other state-of-the-art cognitive theories. We take this approach as starting point, yet instead of trying to model the human reasoner, we aim at identifying clusters of reasoners, which can be characterized by principles or by heuristic strategies. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Version vom 4. September 2017, 13:13 Uhr
Clusters of Humans in Syllogistic Reasoning under the Weak Completion Semantics
Studienarbeit von Richard Mörbitz
- Betreuer Emmanuelle Dietz, Steffen Hölldobler
- Wissensverarbeitung
- Beginn 10. Mai 2017
It seems widely accepted that human reasoning cannot be modeled by means of classical logic. Psychological experiments have repeatedly shown that participants' answers systematically deviate from the classical logically correct answers. Recently, a new computational logic approach to modeling human syllogistic reasoning has been developed which seems to perform better than other state-of-the-art cognitive theories. We take this approach as starting point, yet instead of trying to model the human reasoner, we aim at identifying clusters of reasoners, which can be characterized by principles or by heuristic strategies.
