On the Complexity of Initial Models in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
From International Center for Computational Logic
On the Complexity of Initial Models in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
Hannes StraßHannes Straß, Johannes P. WallnerJohannes P. Wallner
Hannes Straß, Johannes P. Wallner
On the Complexity of Initial Models in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
In Katie Atkinson, eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), to appear. IOS Press
On the Complexity of Initial Models in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
In Katie Atkinson, eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), to appear. IOS Press
- KurzfassungAbstract
Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) constitute one of the most general formal approaches within abstract argumentation. Recently, Bengel and Thimm (2025) proposed so-called initial models in ADFs as a suitable concept for “serializing” reasoning, i.e., decomposing reasoning in ADFs step by step. They showed several complexity results for reasoning with initial models. Our contributions in this paper are (i) that we close a gap in their complexity results of verifying initial models by showing DP-completeness, and (ii) based on our complexity results we provide an answer set programming (ASP) implementation to support systems utilizing initial models. - Projekt:Project: ScaDS.AI
- Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Computational LogicComputational Logic
@inproceedings{SW2026,
author = {Hannes Stra{\ss} and Johannes P. Wallner},
title = {On the Complexity of Initial Models in Abstract Dialectical
Frameworks},
editor = {Katie Atkinson},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on
Computational Models of Argument (COMMA)},
publisher = {IOS Press},
year = {2026}
}