DLP isn't so bad after all
From International Center for Computational Logic
DLP isn't so bad after all
Pascal HitzlerPascal Hitzler, Peter HaasePeter Haase, Markus KrötzschMarkus Krötzsch, York SureYork Sure, Rudi StuderRudi Studer
Pascal Hitzler, Peter Haase, Markus Krötzsch, York Sure, Rudi Studer
DLP isn't so bad after all
In Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks, Bijan Parsia, Peter Patel-Schneider, eds., Proceedings of the Workshop OWL - Experiences and Directions, Galway, Ireland, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, November 2005
DLP isn't so bad after all
In Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks, Bijan Parsia, Peter Patel-Schneider, eds., Proceedings of the Workshop OWL - Experiences and Directions, Galway, Ireland, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, November 2005
- KurzfassungAbstract
We discuss some of the recent controversies concerning the DLP fragment of OWL. We argue that it is a meaningful fragment and can serve as a basic interoperability layer between OWL and logic programming-based ontology languages. - Bemerkung: Note: Online http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-188/sub2.pdf
- Weitere Informationen unter:Further Information: Link
- Projekt:Project: SEKT, SmartWeb, KnowledgeWeb
- Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Wissensbasierte SystemeKnowledge-Based Systems
@inproceedings{HHKSS2005,
author = {Pascal Hitzler and Peter Haase and Markus Kr{\"{o}}tzsch and York
Sure and Rudi Studer},
title = {DLP isn't so bad after all},
editor = {Bernardo Cuenca Grau and Ian Horrocks and Bijan Parsia and Peter
Patel-Schneider},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop {OWL} - Experiences and Directions,
Galway, Ireland},
series = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings},
volume = {188},
year = {2005},
month = {November}
}