Backward Responsibility in Transition Systems Using General Power Indices

Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Version vom 6. März 2025, 15:15 Uhr von Johannes Lehmann (Diskussion | Beiträge)
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche

Toggle side column

Backward Responsibility in Transition Systems Using General Power Indices

Christel BaierChristel Baier,  Roxane van den BosscheRoxane van den Bossche,  Sascha KlüppelholzSascha Klüppelholz,  Johannes LehmannJohannes Lehmann,  Jakob PiribauerJakob Piribauer
Christel Baier, Roxane van den Bossche, Sascha Klüppelholz, Johannes Lehmann, Jakob Piribauer
Backward Responsibility in Transition Systems Using General Power Indices
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024. AAAI Press
  • KurzfassungAbstract
    To improve reliability and the understanding of AI systems, there is increasing interest in the use of formal methods, e.g. model checking. Model checking tools produce a counterexample when a model does not satisfy a property. Understanding these counterexamples is critical for efficient debugging, as it allows the developer to focus on the parts of the program that caused the issue. To this end, we present a new technique that ascribes a responsibility value to each state in a transition system that does not satisfy a given safety property. The value is higher if the non-deterministic choices in a state have more power to change the outcome, given the behaviour observed in the counterexample. For this, we employ a concept from cooperative game theory – namely general power indices, such as the Shapley value – to compute the responsibility of the states. We present an optimistic and pessimistic version of responsibility that differ in how they treat the states that do not lie on the counterexample. We give a characterisation of optimistic responsibility that leads to an efficient algorithm for it and show computational hardness of the pessimistic version. We also present a tool to compute responsibility and show how a stochastic algorithm can be used to approximate responsibility in larger models. These methods can be deployed in the design phase, at runtime and at inspection time to gain insights on causal relations within the behavior of AI systems.
  • Projekt:Project: CPECCeTISECAI
  • Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Algebraische und logische Grundlagen der InformatikAlgebraic and Logical Foundations of Computer Science
@inproceedings{BBKLP2024,
  author    = {Christel Baier and Roxane van den Bossche and Sascha
               Kl{\"{u}}ppelholz and Johannes Lehmann and Jakob Piribauer},
  title     = {Backward Responsibility in Transition Systems Using General Power
               Indices},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the {AAAI} Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
  publisher = {AAAI Press},
  year      = {2024},
  doi       = {10.1609/aaai.v38i18.30013}
}