Inproceedings3205: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Bartosz Bednarczyk (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Bartosz Bednarczyk (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
Zeile 17: | Zeile 17: | ||
|BibTex=@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/BednarczykD19, | |BibTex=@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/BednarczykD19, | ||
author = {Bartosz Bednarczyk and | author = {Bartosz Bednarczyk and | ||
St{\'{e}}phane Demri}, | St{ \'{e} }phane Demri}, | ||
title = {Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly | title = {Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly | ||
Hard?}, | Hard?}, |
Version vom 15. Oktober 2019, 15:40 Uhr
Why propositional quantification makes modal logics on trees robustly hard ?
Bartosz BednarczykBartosz Bednarczyk, Stéphane DemriStéphane Demri

Bartosz Bednarczyk, Stéphane Demri
Why propositional quantification makes modal logics on trees robustly hard ?
LICS 2019, June 2019
Why propositional quantification makes modal logics on trees robustly hard ?
LICS 2019, June 2019
- KurzfassungAbstract
Adding propositional quantification to the modal logics K, T or S4 is known to lead to undecidability but CTL with propositional quantification under the tree semantics (QCTL t ) admits a non-elementary Tower-complete satisfiability problem. We investigate the complexity of strict fragments of QCTL t as well as of the modal logic K with propositional quantification under the tree semantics. More specifically, we show that QCTL t restricted to the temporal operator EX is already Tower-hard, which is unexpected as EX can only enforce local properties. When QCTL t restricted to EX is interpreted on N-bounded trees for some N ≥ 2, we prove that the satisfiability problem is AExppol - complete; AExppol -hardness is established by reduction from a recently introduced tiling problem, instrumental for studying the model-checking problem for interval temporal logics. As consequences of our proof method, we prove Tower-hardness of QCTL t restricted to EF or to EXEF and of the well-known modal logics K, KD, GL, S4, K4 and D4, with propositional quantification under a semantics based on classes of trees. - Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Computational LogicComputational Logic
@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/BednarczykD19,
author = {Bartosz Bednarczyk and
St{ \'{e}}phane Demri},
title = {Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly
Hard?},
booktitle = {34th Annual {ACM/IEEE} Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, {LICS}
2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 24-27, 2019},
pages = {1--13},
year = {2019},
crossref = {DBLP:conf/lics/2019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2019.8785656},
doi = {10.1109/LICS.2019.8785656},
timestamp = {Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:03:36 +0200},
biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/lics/BednarczykD19},
bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}