Inproceedings3205: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Zeile 10: Zeile 10:
|Year=2019
|Year=2019
|Month=Juni
|Month=Juni
|Booktitle=LICS 2019
|Booktitle=LIDS 2019, 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
|Pages=1--13
|Publisher=IEEE
}}
}}
{{Publikation Details
{{Publikation Details
|Abstract=Adding propositional quantification to the modal logics K, T or S4 is known to lead to undecidability but CTL with propositional quantification under the tree semantics (QCTL t ) admits a non-elementary Tower-complete satisfiability problem. We investigate the complexity of strict fragments of QCTL t as well as of the modal logic K with propositional quantification under the tree semantics. More specifically, we show that QCTL t restricted to the temporal operator EX is already Tower-hard, which is unexpected as EX can only enforce local properties. When QCTL t restricted to EX is interpreted on N-bounded trees for some N ≥ 2, we prove that the satisfiability problem is AExppol - complete; AExppol -hardness is established by reduction from a recently introduced tiling problem, instrumental for studying the model-checking problem for interval temporal logics. As consequences of our proof method, we prove Tower-hardness of QCTL t restricted to EF or to EXEF and of the well-known modal logics K, KD, GL, S4, K4 and D4, with propositional quantification under a semantics based on classes of trees.
|Abstract=Adding propositional quantification to the modal logics K, T or S4 is known to lead to undecidability but CTL with propositional quantification under the tree semantics (QCTL t ) admits a non-elementary Tower-complete satisfiability problem. We investigate the complexity of strict fragments of QCTL t as well as of the modal logic K with propositional quantification under the tree semantics. More specifically, we show that QCTL t restricted to the temporal operator EX is already Tower-hard, which is unexpected as EX can only enforce local properties. When QCTL t restricted to EX is interpreted on N-bounded trees for some N ≥ 2, we prove that the satisfiability problem is AExppol - complete; AExppol -hardness is established by reduction from a recently introduced tiling problem, instrumental for studying the model-checking problem for interval temporal logics. As consequences of our proof method, we prove Tower-hardness of QCTL t restricted to EF or to EXEF and of the well-known modal logics K, KD, GL, S4, K4 and D4, with propositional quantification under a semantics based on classes of trees.
|ISBN=978-1-7281-3608-0
|DOI Name=10.1109/LICS.2019.8785656
|Forschungsgruppe=Computational Logic
|Forschungsgruppe=Computational Logic
|BibTex=@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/BednarczykD19,
|BibTex=@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/BednarczykD19,
Zeile 29: Zeile 33:
   timestamp = {Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:03:36 +0200},
   timestamp = {Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:03:36 +0200},
   biburl    = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/lics/BednarczykD19},
   biburl    = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/lics/BednarczykD19},
  bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}
@proceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/2019,
  title    = {34th Annual {ACM/IEEE} Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, {LICS}
              2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 24-27, 2019},
  publisher = {{IEEE}},
  year      = {2019},
  url      = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8765678},
  isbn      = {978-1-7281-3608-0},
  timestamp = {Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:07:26 +0200},
  biburl    = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/lics/2019},
   bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
   bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}
}
}}
}}

Version vom 15. Oktober 2019, 15:53 Uhr

Toggle side column

Why propositional quantification makes modal logics on trees robustly hard ?

Bartosz BednarczykBartosz Bednarczyk,  Stéphane DemriStéphane Demri
Why propositional quantification makes modal logics on trees robustly hard ?


Bartosz Bednarczyk, Stéphane Demri
Why propositional quantification makes modal logics on trees robustly hard ?
LIDS 2019, 34th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1--13, June 2019. IEEE
  • KurzfassungAbstract
    Adding propositional quantification to the modal logics K, T or S4 is known to lead to undecidability but CTL with propositional quantification under the tree semantics (QCTL t ) admits a non-elementary Tower-complete satisfiability problem. We investigate the complexity of strict fragments of QCTL t as well as of the modal logic K with propositional quantification under the tree semantics. More specifically, we show that QCTL t restricted to the temporal operator EX is already Tower-hard, which is unexpected as EX can only enforce local properties. When QCTL t restricted to EX is interpreted on N-bounded trees for some N ≥ 2, we prove that the satisfiability problem is AExppol - complete; AExppol -hardness is established by reduction from a recently introduced tiling problem, instrumental for studying the model-checking problem for interval temporal logics. As consequences of our proof method, we prove Tower-hardness of QCTL t restricted to EF or to EXEF and of the well-known modal logics K, KD, GL, S4, K4 and D4, with propositional quantification under a semantics based on classes of trees.
  • Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Computational LogicComputational Logic
@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/BednarczykD19,
  author    = {Bartosz Bednarczyk and
               St{ \'{e}}phane Demri},
  title     = {Why Propositional Quantification Makes Modal Logics on Trees Robustly
               Hard?},
  booktitle = {34th Annual {ACM/IEEE} Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, {LICS}
               2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 24-27, 2019},
  pages     = {1--13},
  year      = {2019},
  crossref  = {DBLP:conf/lics/2019},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2019.8785656},
  doi       = {10.1109/LICS.2019.8785656},
  timestamp = {Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:03:36 +0200},
  biburl    = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/lics/BednarczykD19},
  bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}

@proceedings{DBLP:conf/lics/2019,
  title     = {34th Annual {ACM/IEEE} Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, {LICS}
               2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 24-27, 2019},
  publisher = [[:Vorlage:IEEE]],
  year      = {2019},
  url       = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8765678},
  isbn      = {978-1-7281-3608-0},
  timestamp = {Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:07:26 +0200},
  biburl    = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/lics/2019},
  bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}