Strategies in Flexible Dispute Derivations for Assumption-Based Argumentation

Martin DillerMartin Diller, Sarah Alice GagglSarah Alice Gaggl, Piotr GorczycaPiotr Gorczyca

Download

Martin Diller, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Piotr Gorczyca
Strategies in Flexible Dispute Derivations for Assumption-Based Argumentation
In Sarah A. Gaggl, Jean-Guy Mailly, Matthias Thimm, Johannes P. Wallner, eds., Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA 2022), volume 3236, 59-72, October 2022. CEUR-WS

Details
Bibtex

KurzfassungAbstract
We put forward and provide an empirical evaluation of strategies for fully automatic flexible dispute derivations for assumption-based argumentation (ABA). These being a novel dialectical means of judging claims in the context of ABA. Central among our findings is that our naive direct implementation of flexible disputes outperforms the current state-of-the-art system for ABA disputes (acceptance of claims, admissible semantics) especially when allowing forward moves from premisses to claims in addition to backwards from conclusions to premisses.
Weitere Informationen unter:Further Information: Link
Projekt:Project: CPEC, NAVAS
Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Logische Programmierung und ArgumentationLogic Programming and Argumentation

@inproceedings{DGG2022,
  author    = {Martin Diller and Sarah Alice Gaggl and Piotr Gorczyca},
  title     = {Strategies in Flexible Dispute Derivations for Assumption-Based
               Argumentation},
  editor    = {Sarah A. Gaggl and Jean-Guy Mailly and Matthias Thimm and
               Johannes P. Wallner},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Systems and
               Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA 2022)},
  volume    = {3236},
  publisher = {CEUR-WS},
  year      = {2022},
  month     = {October},
  pages     = {59-72}
}