Inproceedings991: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Markus Krötzsch (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
Zeile 19: Zeile 19:
}}
}}
{{Publikation Details
{{Publikation Details
|Abstract=We discuss some of the recent controversies concerning the
|Abstract=We discuss some of the recent controversies concerning the DLP fragment of OWL. We argue that it is a meaningful fragment and can serve as a basic interoperability layer between OWL and logic programming-based ontology languages.
DLP fragment of OWL. We argue that it is a meaningful fragment
and can serve as a basic interoperability layer between OWL and logic
programming-based ontology languages.
|ISSN=1613-0073
|ISSN=1613-0073
|VG Wort-Seiten=
|VG Wort-Seiten=

Aktuelle Version vom 23. September 2016, 20:52 Uhr

Toggle side column

DLP isn't so bad after all

Pascal HitzlerPascal Hitzler,  Peter HaasePeter Haase,  Markus KrötzschMarkus Krötzsch,  York SureYork Sure,  Rudi StuderRudi Studer
DLP isn't so bad after all


  • ISSN: 1613-0073
Pascal Hitzler, Peter Haase, Markus Krötzsch, York Sure, Rudi Studer
DLP isn't so bad after all
In Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks, Bijan Parsia, Peter Patel-Schneider, eds., Proceedings of the Workshop OWL - Experiences and Directions, Galway, Ireland, volume 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, November 2005
@inproceedings{HHKSS2005,
  author    = {Pascal Hitzler and Peter Haase and Markus Kr{\"{o}}tzsch and York
               Sure and Rudi Studer},
  title     = {DLP isn't so bad after all},
  editor    = {Bernardo Cuenca Grau and Ian Horrocks and Bijan Parsia and Peter
               Patel-Schneider},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop {OWL} - Experiences and Directions,
               Galway, Ireland},
  series    = {CEUR Workshop Proceedings},
  volume    = {188},
  year      = {2005},
  month     = {November}
}