Techreport1752: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
K (Textersetzung - „}} {{Publikation Author |Rank=3 |Author=“ durch „; “)
Markus Krötzsch (Diskussion | Beiträge)
K (Textersetzung - „|Forschungsgruppe=Computational Logic, Knowledge Systems“ durch „|Forschungsgruppe=Computational Logic, Wissensbasierte Systeme“)
 
Zeile 17: Zeile 17:
|Abstract=We introduce ELP as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. ELP is based on the tractable description logic EL++, and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus ELP extends EL++ with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of ELP to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into ELP. While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in ELP without losing tractability.
|Abstract=We introduce ELP as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. ELP is based on the tractable description logic EL++, and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus ELP extends EL++ with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of ELP to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into ELP. While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in ELP without losing tractability.
|Link=http://korrekt.org/page/ELP:_Tractable_Rules_for_OWL_2, http://korrekt.org/papers/KroetzschRudolphHitzler_ELP_TR_2008.pdf
|Link=http://korrekt.org/page/ELP:_Tractable_Rules_for_OWL_2, http://korrekt.org/papers/KroetzschRudolphHitzler_ELP_TR_2008.pdf
|Forschungsgruppe=Computational Logic, Knowledge Systems
|Forschungsgruppe=Computational Logic, Wissensbasierte Systeme
|VG Wort-Seiten=
|VG Wort-Seiten=
}}
}}

Aktuelle Version vom 24. Mai 2016, 18:16 Uhr

Toggle side column
ELP: Tractable Rules for OWL 2


Markus Krötzsch, Sebastian Rudolph, Pascal Hitzler
ELP: Tractable Rules for OWL 2
Technical Report, Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), volume 1752, April 2008
  • KurzfassungAbstract
    We introduce ELP as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. ELP is based on the tractable description logic EL++, and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus ELP extends EL++ with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of ELP to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into ELP. While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in ELP without losing tractability.
  • Weitere Informationen unter:Further Information: LinkLink
  • Forschungsgruppe:Research Group: Computational LogicComputational LogicWissensbasierte SystemeKnowledge-Based Systems
@techreport{KRH2008,
  author      = {Markus Kr{\"{o}}tzsch and Sebastian Rudolph and Pascal Hitzler},
  title       = {ELP: Tractable Rules for {OWL} 2},
  institution = {Institut {AIFB,} Universit{\"{a}}t Karlsruhe (TH)},
  year        = {2008},
  month       = {April}
}