News88: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus International Center for Computational Logic
Larry Gonzalez (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
Larry Gonzalez (Diskussion | Beiträge) Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
||
| Zeile 13: | Zeile 13: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3349 Tractable Diversity: Scalable Multiperspective Ontology Management via Standpoint EL] | [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3349 Tractable Diversity: Scalable Multiperspective Ontology Management via Standpoint EL] | ||
[[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]], [[Sebastian Rudolph]] | [[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]], [[Sebastian Rudolph]] and [[Hannes Straß]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| Zeile 29: | Zeile 29: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3353 Do Repeat Yourself: Understanding Sufficient Conditions for Restricted Chase Non-Termination] | [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3353 Do Repeat Yourself: Understanding Sufficient Conditions for Restricted Chase Non-Termination] | ||
[[Lukas Gerlach]] | [[Lukas Gerlach]] and [https://www-sop.inria.fr/members/David.Carral/ David Carral] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14243 Standpoint Linear Temporal Logic] | [https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14243 Standpoint Linear Temporal Logic] | ||
[https://www.inf.unibz.it/~gigante/ Nicola Gigante], [[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]] | [https://www.inf.unibz.it/~gigante/ Nicola Gigante], [[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]] and [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] | ||
</div> | |||
<div> | |||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3352 Pushing the Boundaries of Tractable Multiperspective Reasoning: A Deduction Calculus for Standpoint EL+] | |||
[[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]], [[Sebastian Rudolph]] and [[Hannes Straß]] | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02521 Connecting Proof Theory and Knowledge Representation: Sequent Calculi and the Chase with Existential Rules] | [https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02521 Connecting Proof Theory and Knowledge Representation: Sequent Calculi and the Chase with Existential Rules] | ||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] | [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] and [[Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Zeile 49: | Zeile 53: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Deciding Subsumption in Defeasible ELI⊥ with Typicality Models | Deciding Subsumption in Defeasible ELI⊥ with Typicality Models | ||
[https://igorcsc.github.io/ Igor de Camargo E Souza Câmara] | [https://igorcsc.github.io/ Igor de Camargo E Souza Câmara] and [[Anni-Yasmin Turhan]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Derivation-Graph-Based Characterizations of Decidable Existential Rule Sets | Derivation-Graph-Based Characterizations of Decidable Existential Rule Sets | ||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] | [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] and [[Sebastian Rudolph]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Computing Stable Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks using Formal Concept Analysis | Computing Stable Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks using Formal Concept Analysis | ||
[[Sergei Obiedkov]] | [[Sergei Obiedkov]] and [https://www.informatik.fb2.frankfurt-university.de/~sertkaya/ Barış Sertkaya] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Zeile 65: | Zeile 69: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Notation3 as an Existential Rule Language | Notation3 as an Existential Rule Language | ||
[[Dörthe Arndt]] | [[Dörthe Arndt]] and [[Stephan Mennicke]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02287 A Logical Analysis of Instrumentality Judgements: Means-End Relations in the Context of Experience and Expectations] | [https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02287 A Logical Analysis of Instrumentality Judgements: Means-End Relations in the Context of Experience and Expectations] | ||
Kees van Berkel, [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] | Kees van Berkel, [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Tim_Lyon/ Tim S. Lyon] and [https://philosophy.ceu.edu/people/matteo-pascucci-0 Matteo Pascucci]. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3354 Nemo: First Glimpse of a New Rule Engine] | [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3354 Nemo: First Glimpse of a New Rule Engine] | ||
[[Alex Ivliev]], [[Stefan Ellmauthaler]], [[Lukas Gerlach]], [[Maximilian Marx]], [[Matthias Meißner]], [[Simon Meusel]] | [[Alex Ivliev]], [[Stefan Ellmauthaler]], [[Lukas Gerlach]], [[Maximilian Marx]], [[Matthias Meißner]], [[Simon Meusel]] and [[Markus Krötzsch]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
| Zeile 89: | Zeile 93: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Abstract Domains for Database Manipulating Processes | Abstract Domains for Database Manipulating Processes | ||
Tobias Schüler, [[Stephan Mennicke]] | Tobias Schüler, [[Stephan Mennicke]] and Malte Lochau | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
|Beschreibung EN=<p>Each year, thousands of researchers worldwide submit their work to prominent conferences within their specific fields, competing for the recognition that comes from having their papers accepted. Highly esteemed conferences generally maintain a low acceptance rate, reflecting a stringent selection process. To secure a place, research papers must not only be innovative and of superior quality, but they also need to resonate with and contribute significantly to their respective communities.</p> | |Beschreibung EN=<p>Each year, thousands of researchers worldwide submit their work to prominent conferences within their specific fields, competing for the recognition that comes from having their papers accepted. Highly esteemed conferences generally maintain a low acceptance rate, reflecting a stringent selection process. To secure a place, research papers must not only be innovative and of superior quality, but they also need to resonate with and contribute significantly to their respective communities.</p> | ||
| Zeile 104: | Zeile 108: | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
[https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3349 Tractable Diversity: Scalable Multiperspective Ontology Management via Standpoint EL] | [https://iccl.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Inproceedings3349 Tractable Diversity: Scalable Multiperspective Ontology Management via Standpoint EL] | ||
[[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]], [[Sebastian Rudolph]] and [[Hannes | [[Lucía Gómez Álvarez]], [[Sebastian Rudolph]] and [[Hannes Straß]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
Version vom 24. Juli 2023, 10:43 Uhr
Neuigkeit vom 21. Juli 2023
ICCL feiert großen Erfolg mit zehn angenommenen Beiträgen bei Top-Konferenzen
Jedes Jahr konkurrieren Tausende Forscher:innen weltweit um die Möglichkeit, ihre neusten Arbeiten auf einer renommierten Konferenz vorstellen zu dürfen. Bei hoch angesehenen Konferenzen ist der Auswahlprozess dabei in der Regel besonders streng. Damit die eigene Arbeit akzeptiert wird, müssen Forschungsbeiträge nicht nur innovativ sein und eine hohe Qualität aufweisen, sondern auch in den jeweiligen Communities Anklang finden und einen bedeutenden Beitrag leisten.
Zu den führenden Konferenzen in den Bereichen Künstliche Intelligenz und Informatik im Allgemeinen zählen hierbei die International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), die International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR) sowie die European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA). Wissenschaftler:innen des International Center For Computational Logic (ICCL) ist es gelungen, gleich mehrere ihrer Beiträge bei allen diesen Top-Konferenzen akzeptiert zu bekommen. Akzeptiert wurden drei Beiträge bei IJCAI 2023, vier bei JELIA 2023 sowie drei Einreichungen bei KR 2023. Darüber hinaus sind Forscher:innen des ICCL auch in zahlreichen anderen Konferenzen und Workshops vertreten.
Wir gratulieren unseren Kollegen zu diesem Erfolg und freuen uns darauf, auch in Zukunft weitere ihrer hervorragenden Arbeiten lesen zu können.
Bei IJCAI 2023 wurden folgende Beiträge akzeptiert:
Tractable Diversity: Scalable Multiperspective Ontology Management via Standpoint EL Lucía Gómez Álvarez, Sebastian Rudolph and Hannes Straß
A Unifying Formal Approach to Importance Values in Boolean Functions Hans Harder, Simon Jantsch, Christel Baier, Clemens Dubslaff
More for Less: Safe Policy Improvement with Stronger Performance Guarantees Patrick Wienhöft, Marnix Suilen, Thiago D. Simão, Clemens Dubslaff, Christel Baier, Nils Jansen
Die KR'23 hat folgende Beiträge des ICCL akzeptiert:
Do Repeat Yourself: Understanding Sufficient Conditions for Restricted Chase Non-Termination Lukas Gerlach and David Carral
Pushing the Boundaries of Tractable Multiperspective Reasoning: A Deduction Calculus for Standpoint EL+ Lucía Gómez Álvarez, Sebastian Rudolph and Hannes Straß
Connecting Proof Theory and Knowledge Representation: Sequent Calculi and the Chase with Existential Rules Tim S. Lyon and Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja
Die für JELIA'23 angenommenen Arbeiten sind:
Beyond ALCreg: Exploring Non-Regular Extensions of PDL with Description Logics Features Bartosz Bednarczyk
Deciding Subsumption in Defeasible ELI⊥ with Typicality Models Igor de Camargo E Souza Câmara and Anni-Yasmin Turhan
Derivation-Graph-Based Characterizations of Decidable Existential Rule Sets Tim S. Lyon and Sebastian Rudolph
Computing Stable Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks using Formal Concept Analysis Sergei Obiedkov and Barış Sertkaya
Weitere Beiträge:
Notation3 as an Existential Rule Language Dörthe Arndt and Stephan Mennicke
A Logical Analysis of Instrumentality Judgements: Means-End Relations in the Context of Experience and Expectations Kees van Berkel, Tim S. Lyon and Matteo Pascucci.
Nemo: First Glimpse of a New Rule Engine Alex Ivliev, Stefan Ellmauthaler, Lukas Gerlach, Maximilian Marx, Matthias Meißner, Simon Meusel and Markus Krötzsch
Voting for Bins: Integrating Imprecise Probabilistic Beliefs into the Condorcet Jury Theorem Jonas Karge
Abstract Domains for Database Manipulating Processes Tobias Schüler, Stephan Mennicke and Malte Lochau
